Voice, facts, boundaries, commercial rules, and handoff conditions.
Existing prompts and scripts are audited before new rules are layered on top.
One-model pilot
Start with one model, one primary channel, and real workflows. FanLTV maps the current operation, configures the model, begins under human control, and measures what should automate next.
Pilot scope
The exact schedule and commercial scope are agreed after the initial workflow review.
Existing prompts and scripts are audited before new rules are layered on top.
The readiness check covers the provider plan and account-specific limitations.
Start where the agency has a measurable bottleneck rather than enabling everything at once.
Rollout path

Real workspace, supervised rollout
The pilot uses actual channel behavior while preserving manual control, visible delivery state, and an accountable history of what the system did.
Review production evidencePilot report
A useful pilot closes with operational and commercial evidence, not only a list of generated messages.
Inbound coverage, unanswered recovery, proactive eligibility, delivery success, duplicate prevention, and human exceptions.
State progression, memory use, language consistency, repetition, offer timing, safety handoffs, and operator corrections.
Payment outcomes, repeat purchases, reactivation, operator hours, provider/AI costs, and expected LTV impact where the data supports it.
Commercial structure
Pilot pricing depends on the channel, message volume, content workflow, model configuration, and the amount of supervised setup required. FanLTV does not hide those variables inside a generic seat price.
The proposal separates FanLTV implementation and usage from third-party provider, platform, payment, and model/API charges. The initial review defines what is included, what remains optional, and what success will be measured against.
Request the pilot
We will contact you to confirm the channel, access method, baseline, and safest starting mode.